4.7 Article

Stand-scale climate change impacts on forests over large areas: transient responses and projection uncertainties

Journal

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2313

Keywords

adaption; dynamic vegetation model; ForClim; forest gap model; forest model; management; mountain forest; species composition; Switzerland; tipping point; uncertainty

Funding

  1. Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI [C14.0046]
  2. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment FOEN
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [140968]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a comprehensive assessment of the climate change sensitivity of managed Swiss forests and found that different forest stands at various elevations and locations had different responses to climate change. It was recommended to mix drought-tolerant species at all elevations to mitigate future adverse climate effects. The largest uncertainty in model projections was associated with climate change scenarios, while the influence of both site conditions and the model version on some of the projections indicates that considerations beyond climate change scenarios are necessary in climate change impact assessments.
The increasing impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems have triggered multiple model-based impact assessments for the future, which typically focused either on a small number of stand-scale case studies or on large scale analyses (i.e., continental to global). Therefore, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the local impacts over large areas (i.e., regions to countries), which is particularly problematic for forest management. We provide a comprehensive, high-resolution assessment of the climate change sensitivity of managed Swiss forests (similar to 10,000 km(2)), which cover a wide range of environmental conditions. We used a dynamic vegetation model to project the development of typical forest stands derived from a stratification of the Third National Forest Inventory until the end of the 22nd century. Two types of simulations were conducted: one limited to using the extant local species, the other enabling immigration of potentially more climate-adapted species. Moreover, to assess the robustness of our projections, we quantified and decomposed the uncertainty in model projections resulting from the following sources: (1) climate change scenarios, (2) local site conditions, and (3) the dynamic vegetation model itself (i.e., represented by a set of model versions), an aspect hitherto rarely taken into account. The simulations showed substantial changes in basal area and species composition, with dissimilar sensitivity to climate change across and within elevation zones. Higher-elevation stands generally profited from increased temperature, but soil conditions strongly modulated this response. Low-elevation stands were increasingly subject to drought, with strong negative impacts on forest growth. Furthermore, current stand structure had a strong effect on the simulated response. The admixture of drought-tolerant species was found advisable across all elevations to mitigate future adverse climate-induced effects. The largest uncertainty in model projections was associated with climate change scenarios. Uncertainty induced by the model version was generally largest where overall simulated climate change impacts were small, thus corroborating the utility of the model for making projections into the future. Yet, the large influence of both site conditions and the model version on some of the projections indicates that uncertainty sources other than climate change scenarios need to be considered in climate change impact assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available