4.7 Article

An experimental study of permeability development as a function of crystal-free melt viscosity

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 435, Issue -, Pages 45-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.11.035

Keywords

vesiculation; gas permeability; viscosity; decompression; crystal-free melts

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EAR 1145194]
  2. AXA Research Fund
  3. Royal Society
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1145194] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Permeability development in magmas controls gas escape and, as a consequence, modulates eruptive activity. To date, there are few experimental controls on bubble growth and permeability development, particularly in low viscosity melts. To address this knowledge gap, we have run controlled decompression experiments on crystal-free rhyolite (76 wt.% SiO2), rhyodacite (70 wt.% SiO2), K-phonolite (55 wt.% SiO2) and basaltic andesite (54 wt.% SiO2) melts. This suite of experiments allows us to examine controls on the critical porosity at which vesiculating melts become permeable. As starting materials we used both fine powders and solid slabs of pumice, obsidian and annealed starting materials with viscosities of similar to 10(2) to similar to 10(6) Pa s. We saturated the experiments with water at 900 degrees (rhyolite, rhyodacite, and phonolite) and 1025 degrees C (basaltic andesite) at 150 MPa for 2-72 hrs and decompressed samples isothermally to final pressures of 125 to 10 MPa at rates of 0.25-4.11 MPafs. Sample porosity was calculated from reflected light images of polished charges and permeability was measured using a bench top gas permeameter and application of the Forchheimer equation to estimate both viscous (k(1)) and inertial (k(2)) permeabilities. Degassing conditions were assessed by measuring dissolved water contents using micro-Fourier-Transform Infrared (mu-FTIR) techniques. All experiment charges are impermeable below a critical porosity (phi(c)) that varies among melt compositions. For experiments decompressed at 0.25 MPa/s, we find the percolation threshold for rhyolite is 68.3 +/- 2.2 vol.%; for rhyodacite is 77.3 +/- 3.8 vol.%; and for K-phonolite is 75.6 +/- 1.9 vol.%. Rhyolite decompressed at 3-4 MPa/s has a percolation threshold of 74 +/- 1.8 vol.%. These results are similar to previous experiments on silicic melts and to high permeability thresholds inferred for silicic pumice. All basaltic andesite melts decompressed at 0.25 MPa/s, in contrast, have permeabilities below the detection limit (similar to 10(-15) m(2)), and a maximum porosity of 63 vol.%. Additionally, although the measured porosities of basaltic andesite experiments are similar to 10-35 vol.% lower than calculated equilibrium porosities, mu-FTIR analyses confirm the basaltic andesite melts remained in equilibrium during degassing. We show that the low porosities and permeabilities are a consequence of short melt relaxation timescales during synand post-decompression degassing. Our results suggest that basaltic andesite melts reached phi(c) > 63 vol.% and subsequently degassed; loss of internal bubble pressure caused the bubbles to shrink and their connecting apertures to seal before quench, closing the connected pathways between bubbles. Our results challenge the hypothesis that low viscosity melts have a permeability threshold of similar to 30 vol.%, and instead support the high permeability thresholds observed in analogue experiments on low viscosity materials. Importantly, however, these low viscosity melts are unable to maintain high porosities once the percolation threshold is exceeded because of rapid outgassing and collapse of the permeable network. We conclude, therefore, that melt viscosity has little effect on percolation threshold development, but does influence outgassing. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available