A Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Science Assessments: Factors Impacting Machine-Human Score Agreements
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Science Assessments: Factors Impacting Machine-Human Score Agreements
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-11-19
DOI
10.1007/s10956-020-09875-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- On the Validity of Machine Learning-based Next Generation Science Assessments: A Validity Inferential Network
- (2021) Xiaoming Zhai et al. Journal of Science Education and Technology
- The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing
- (2019) Mengxiao Zhu et al. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
- The Impact of Misspelled Words on Automated Computer Scoring: A Case Study of Scientific Explanations
- (2016) Minsu Ha et al. Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Can we open the black box of AI?
- (2016) Davide Castelvecchi NATURE
- Automated analysis of short responses in an interactive synthetic tutoring system for introductory physics
- (2016) Christopher M. Nakamura et al. Physical Review Physics Education Research
- Automatic Coding of Short Text Responses via Clustering in Educational Assessment
- (2015) Fabian Zehner et al. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
- Automated Guidance for Thermodynamics Essays: Critiquing Versus Revisiting
- (2015) Dermot F. Donnelly et al. Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
- (2015) M. I. Jordan et al. SCIENCE
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Assessing Scientific Practices Using Machine-Learning Methods: How Closely Do They Match Clinical Interview Performance?
- (2013) Elizabeth P. Beggrow et al. Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Applying Computerized-Scoring Models of Written Biological Explanations across Courses and Colleges: Prospects and Limitations
- (2011) Minsu Ha et al. CBE-Life Sciences Education
- Performance evaluation of an online argumentation learning assistance agent
- (2011) Chenn-Jung Huang et al. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
- Transforming Biology Assessment with Machine Learning: Automated Scoring of Written Evolutionary Explanations
- (2011) Ross H. Nehm et al. Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Human vs. Computer Diagnosis of Students’ Natural Selection Knowledge: Testing the Efficacy of Text Analytic Software
- (2011) Ross H. Nehm et al. Journal of Science Education and Technology
- An analysis of students’ gaming behaviors in an intelligent tutoring system: predictors and impacts
- (2011) Kasia Muldner et al. USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION
- Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis
- (2011) Spyros Konstantopoulos Research Synthesis Methods
- How is Science Learning Assessed at the Postsecondary Level? Assessment and Grading Practices in College Biology, Chemistry and Physics
- (2009) Karleen Goubeaud Journal of Science Education and Technology
- Assessing creative problem-solving with automated text grading
- (2008) Hao-Chuan Wang et al. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started