4.7 Article

Are there opportunities for climate-smart agriculture? Assessing costs and benefits of sustainability investments and planning policies in Southern Africa

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123847

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. World Bank
  2. Lesotho climate-smart agriculture investment plan (CSAIP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzes a public investment program to promote climate-smart agriculture in Lesotho, showing that the program is beneficial for both farmers and society as a whole, as it can reduce greenhouse gas emissions intensity and positively contribute to climate change mitigation.
Transformation in the smallholder agricultural sector towards more sustainable and cleaner production systems is needed in Southern Africa. Climate-smart agriculture could be an opportunity in this respect. The paper presents a cost-benefit analysis of the public investment program to promote climate-smart agriculture in Lesotho. Economic profitability of investing in such program in nationwide crop, livestock and aquaculture smallholders' production is assessed, considering costs and benefits at private level and those that accrue to society. Given uncertainty about the future, a development pathway commercially oriented is compared with a pathway aimed at increasing households' capacity to adapt their farming systems to the changing climate. Investment returns are above the opportunity cost of capital, under both pathways, indicating the convenience for farmers and the whole society in investing in climate-smart agriculture. The program also leads to a decrease in the greenhouse gas emissions' intensity, positively contributing to climate change mitigation. The economic evaluation of the carbon-balance increases societal profitability of the investment program. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available