4.7 Article

A comprehensive evaluation paradigm for regional green development based on Five-Circle Model: A case study from BeijingTianjin-Hebei

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124076

Keywords

Green development; Five-circle model; Evaluation indicators; Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei; Policy recommendations

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71871146]
  2. MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Science [18YJA630090]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An evaluation of a region's green development status is an essential prerequisite to improve region's ecological environment. Indicator systems used for such evaluations within previous studies mainly based on the meanings ascribed to green development. However, these meanings were relatively narrow, focusing primarily on economic development and environmental protection. Therefore, in this study, we proposed an updated definition of green development, and proposed a corresponding five-circle model of green development. We devised a methodology to determine an evaluation indicator system of green development based on five-circle model. We used a combination of subjective and objective weight methods to evaluate the green development performance of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, which is China's core economic zone. The results of the evaluation indicated a general improvement in the overall performance of this region during the period 2006-2017. Within the region, Beijing ranked highest because of the strong performances of its economic advancement, resource utilization, and social progress indexes. Tianjin's economic advancement and social progress indexes performed well, but its ecological environment index performed poorly. In Hebei, the economic advancement and social progress indexes were both underdeveloped. In conclusion, we offer policy recommendations to promote green development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available