4.5 Review

Aetiology of Ludwig van Beethoven's hearing impairment: hypotheses over the past 100 years - A systematic review

Journal

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 278, Issue 8, Pages 2703-2712

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06467-w

Keywords

Beethoven; Deafness; Hearing loss; Aetiology; Cause

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Even 250 years after Beethoven's birth, the exact cause of his hearing impairment remains unclear. Over the past 100 years, otosclerosis and syphilis have been predominantly suggested as the underlying causes. In recent years, there has been a remarkable revival of the hypothesis of syphilis, and differential diagnosis of neural deafness in therapeutic intervention by cochlear implantation is relevant today.
Objectives Even 250 years after Beethoven's birth, the irrevocable cause of his hearing impairment remains unclear despite multiple publications by different professional groups. This study aimed to analyse the development of the most likely aetiologies during the last 100 years by a systematic review of the relevant medical literature. Methods A systematic review of medical literature in PubMed(R), PubMed Central(R), and Web of Science(R) for the period 1920-2020 was conducted. Medical publications between 1920 and 1935 were additionally searched manually by review of reference lists. Studies were eligible when a statement regarding the most likely aetiology of the hearing loss of Beethoven was the aimed objective of the publication. Results 48 publications were included. The following aetiologies were supposed: otosclerosis (n = 10), syphilis (n = 9), Paget's disease (n = 6), neural deafness (n = 5), immunopathy with inflammatory bowel disease, neural deafness with otosclerosis, sarcoidosis or lead intoxication (n = 2), and systemic lupus erythematosus, trauma, labyrinthitis or inner ear disease (n = 1). There is an ongoing effort with a mean publication frequency in this topic of 0.48/year. From 1920 to 1970, otolaryngologists were the group with the highest interest in this field (67%), whereas since 1971 most authors have belonged to non-otolaryngologic subspecialities (81%). Conclusion Over the past 100 years, otosclerosis and syphilis were predominantly supposed to be the underlying causes. The hypothesis of syphilis-although rejected for a long time-has had a remarkable revival during the past 20 years. Regarding the outcome following therapeutic intervention by cochlear implantation, the differential diagnosis of neural deafness would be relevant today.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available