- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reliability of evidence‐review methods in restoration ecology
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-12-22
DOI
10.1111/cobi.13661
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Towards an integrated perspective of biological conservation and ecological restoration
- (2020) Katie McMahen et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
- Applied ecological research is on the rise but connectivity barriers persist between four major subfields
- (2019) Timothy L. Staples et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Land Restoration in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Overview of Recent, Ongoing and Planned Restoration Initiatives and Their Potential for Climate Change Mitigation
- (2019) Erika Romijn et al. Forests
- Is gardening a useful metaphor for conservation and restoration? History and controversy
- (2019) Amy B. McEuen et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
- Use of study design principles would increase the reproducibility of reviews in conservation biology
- (2019) Eliza M. Grames et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Assessing ecological restoration as a research topic using bibliometric indicators
- (2018) João Paulo Romanelli et al. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
- Evidence-based restoration in the Anthropocene-from acting with purpose to acting for impact
- (2018) Steven J. Cooke et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
- Positive site selection bias in meta-analyses comparing natural regeneration to active forest restoration
- (2018) J. Leighton Reid et al. Science Advances
- OUP accepted manuscript
- (2018) BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
- (2018) Jessica Gurevitch et al. NATURE
- Evolution of the field of ecological restoration over the last three decades: a bibliometric analysis
- (2018) Yingjie Guan et al. RESTORATION ECOLOGY
- Response to “Collating science-based evidence to inform public opinion on the environmental effects of marine drilling platforms in the Mediterranean Sea”
- (2017) Neal R. Haddaway JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
- Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up
- (2017) Karen D. Holl SCIENCE
- The reliability of evidence review methodology in environmental science and conservation
- (2016) Bethan C. O’Leary et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
- Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions
- (2016) Timothy H. Parker et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Evidence-based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration
- (2016) Heida L. Diefenderfer et al. Ecosphere
- Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews
- (2015) N.R. Haddaway et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Optimal Conservation Outcomes Require Both Restoration and Protection
- (2015) Hugh P. Possingham et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence syntheses in conservation and environmental science: A methodology
- (2014) Paul Woodcock et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Uses and misuses of meta-analysis in plant ecology
- (2014) Julia Koricheva et al. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
- Information retrieval for ecological syntheses
- (2014) Helen R. Bayliss et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Meta-analysis: A need for well-defined usage in ecology and conservation biology
- (2013) Daniela Vetter et al. Ecosphere
- Meta-analysis at the intersection of evolutionary ecology and conservation
- (2012) Isabelle M. Côté et al. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY
- Assessment of the quality of meta-analysis in agronomy
- (2011) Aurore Philibert et al. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
- Flawed Meta-Analysis of Biodiversity Effects of Forest Management
- (2010) PANU HALME et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Getting started with meta-analysis
- (2010) Freya Harrison Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Doing more good than harm – Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management
- (2009) Andrew S. Pullin et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
- (2009) Nees Jan van Eck et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started