4.8 Article

Isotopic Resolution of Protein Complexes up to 466 kDa Using Individual Ion Mass Spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 2723-2727

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03282

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intensifying Innovation (I2) program at Thermo Fisher Scientific
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health [P41 GM108569]
  3. National Institute on Aging [RF1 AG063903]
  4. NIH Office of the Director [S10 OD025194]
  5. F31 Fellowship [F31 AG069456]
  6. National Institute on Drug Abuse [P30 DA018310]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Native mass spectrometry allows characterization of biomolecular complexes in gas phase, but complexity due to solvation, adducts, and modifications is typically unresolved for masses over 150 kDa. Higher resolution approaches for intact proteins and complexes are needed. Charge detection mass spectrometry achieved isotopic resolution for pyruvate kinase (232 kDa) and beta-galactosidase (466 kDa), extending the limits of isotopic resolution for high mass and high m/z.
Native mass spectrometry involves transferring large biomolecular complexes into the gas phase, enabling the characterization of their composition and stoichiometry. However, the overlap in distributions created by residual solvation, ionic adducts, and post-translational modifications creates a high degree of complexity that typically goes unresolved at masses above similar to 150 kDa. Therefore, native mass spectrometry would greatly benefit from higher resolution approaches for intact proteins and their complexes. By recording mass spectra of individual ions via charge detection mass spectrometry, we report isotopic resolution for pyruvate kinase (232 kDa) and beta-galactosidase (466 kDa), extending the limits of isotopic resolution for high mass and high m/z by >2.5-fold and >1.6-fold, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available