4.5 Review

Catalytic synthesis of renewablep-xylene from biomass-derived 2,5-dimethylfuran: a mini review

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 541-554

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-01042-z

Keywords

Biomass; 2; 5-Dimethylfuran; Polyethylene terephthalate; Renewable polymer; p-xylene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work reviews the renewable synthesis of p-xylene from biomass-derived carbohydrates, discussing the techno-economic analysis of renewable PET and the possibility of a circular economy using chemical and enzymatic recycling strategies. The article also summarizes the role and influencing factors of catalysts in the synthesis of PX.
In this work, the renewable synthesis ofp-xylene (PX) from biomass-derived carbohydrates has been reviewed. PX is a crucial chemical feedstock and an essential starting material of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). PX can be produced selectively by the Diels-Alder reaction between ethylene and 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF) followed by catalytic dehydration of the oxanorbornene adduct. DMF is primarily produced by the catalytic hydrogenation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural (HMF), a furanic intermediate produced by the acid-catalyzed hydrolysis/dehydration of biomass-derived hexoses. With ethylene being sourced by dehydrating bioethanol, PET can be made biorenewable in its entirety. The atom economy and carbon efficiency of converting glucose into PX have been calculated. The existing literature (both theoretical and experimental) on the catalytic production of PX from DMF and ethylene are summarized, and future directions on this research have been proposed. The effect of Bronsted and Lewis acidity, porosity, and surface area of the heterogeneous catalysts on the selectivity and yield of PX have been highlighted. In addition, the techno-economic analysis of renewable PET, its future prospects based on the petroleum market, and the possibility of a circular economy of PET using chemical and enzymatic recycling strategies have been discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available