The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors

Title
The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
Authors
Keywords
Peer review, Q-sort, Randomized controlled trials, Recommendations to reviewers
Journal
BMC Medicine
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-07-04
DOI
10.1186/s12916-015-0395-3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprint

Contact the author

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation