4.5 Article

The influence of phosphorous source on the properties of NASICON lithiumion conductor Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3

Journal

SOLID STATE IONICS
Volume 354, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2020.115417

Keywords

Ionic conductivity; Microstructure; Crystallization; Hydrothermal

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017MS138]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different sources of the starting materials can influence the properties of the lithium-ion conductors. Two different sources of phosphorous are used to prepare NASICON type lithium-ion conductor Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)(3) via a hydrothermal-assisted solid-state method in this paper. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are conducted to characterize the structure and morphology. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is used to characterize the conductivity of the samples. The sample using NH4H2PO4 as phosphorus source exhibits a lower total conductivity than the sample using H3PO4 as phosphorus source, which is attributed to the lower relative density and the more porous microstructure obtained in N-LATP. While the more porous microstructure formed in N-LATP is rooted in the loss of driving force for sintering caused by the earlier crystallized rhombohedral phase LiTi2(PO4)(3). The porous microstructure results in a tortuous path for lithium ions migration. Different sources of phosphorous can result in different reactions taken place in the hydrothermal reactor, thereby leading to a different particle size distribution, relative density, crystallography and morphology, eventually affecting the lithium ion conduction in the pelletized samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available