4.3 Article

Contamination, Distribution and Health Risk Assessment of Risk Elements in Topsoil for Amusement Parks in Xi'an, China

Journal

POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 601-618

Publisher

HARD
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/123606

Keywords

topsoil; toxic elements; spatial distribution; pollution level; XRF

Funding

  1. Fund Project of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation [2019-JC11]
  2. Scientific research project of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education [16JK1495]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that manganese had the highest content, cobalt's Igeo was relatively high in all four parks, the pollution condition was most serious in the Urban Sports Park, and children were mainly affected by risk element pollution through oral intake.
The index of geo-accumulation (Igeo) and the pollution load index (PLI) were used to assess the pollution level and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) health risk model was implemented to determine the health risk for children. Besides, a geographic information system (GIS) was utilized to map the distribution characteristics of risk elements contents. The results showed that: (1) the mean content of Mn was the highest in each park. Besides, the mean content of all risk elements except As exceeded the background value of Shaanxi in each park. (2) The Igeo of Co was obviously higher than other elements in each park and the highest (4.07) content occurred in the Xing Qing Park (XQP). The pollution condition of the Urban Sports Park (USP) was the most serious among the four parks. (3) The children were more susceptible to risk elements pollution through oral intake. (4) The hazard indices (HI) of non-carcinogenic risk (NCR) were within the safe range (HI = 1) and the carcinogenic risks (CR) of Cr, Ni, As and Co for children were within the receivable range in each park.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available