4.7 Article

Video frame interpolation via optical flow estimation with image inpainting

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
Volume 35, Issue 12, Pages 2087-2102

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/int.22285

Keywords

frame interpolation; image inpainting; optical flow; video processing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China Zhejiang Joint Fund [U1609218]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572286, 61873145]
  3. Joint Fund Project for Excellent Young Talents of Shandong Provincial Universities [ZR2017JL029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As we all know, video frame rate determines the quality of the video. The higher the frame rate, the smoother the movements in the picture, the clearer the information expressed, and the better the viewing experience for people. Video interpolation aims to increase the video frame rate by generating a new frame image using the relevant information between two consecutive frames, which is essential in the field of computer vision. The traditional motion compensation interpolation method will cause holes and overlaps in the reconstructed frame, and is easily affected by the quality of optical flow. Therefore, this paper proposes a video frame interpolation method via optical flow estimation with image inpainting. First, the optical flow between the input frames is estimated via combined local and global-total variation (CLG-TV) optical flow estimation model. Then, the intermediate frames are synthesized under the guidance of the optical flow. Finally, the nonlocal self-similarity between the video frames is used to solve the optimization problem, to fix the pixel loss area in the interpolated frame. Quantitative and qualitative experimental results show that this method can effectively improve the quality of optical flow estimation, generate realistic and smooth video frames, and effectively increase the video frame rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available