Risk of Bias Assessments and Evidence Syntheses for Observational Epidemiologic Studies of Environmental and Occupational Exposures: Strengths and Limitations
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Risk of Bias Assessments and Evidence Syntheses for Observational Epidemiologic Studies of Environmental and Occupational Exposures: Strengths and Limitations
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 128, Issue 9, Pages 095002
Publisher
Environmental Health Perspectives
Online
2020-09-14
DOI
10.1289/ehp6980
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Red and Processed Meats and Health Risks: How Strong Is the Evidence?
- (2020) Frank Qian et al. DIABETES CARE
- Challenges and recommendations on the conduct of systematic reviews of observational epidemiologic studies in environmental and occupational health
- (2020) Whitney D. Arroyave et al. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology
- Don't abandon evidence and process on air pollution policy
- (2019) Gretchen T. Goldman et al. SCIENCE
- Causal Inference in Environmental Epidemiology
- (2019) Neil Pearce et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Welding fumes and lung cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies
- (2019) Manoj Kumar Honaryar et al. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
- The Problem With Mechanistic Risk of Bias Assessments in Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies and a Practical Alternative: Assessing the Impact of Specific Sources of Potential Bias
- (2019) David A Savitz et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Environmental Protection Agency Toxic Substances Control Act Systematic Review Method May Curtail Science Used to Inform Policies, With Profound Implications for Public Health
- (2019) Veena I. Singla et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Effect of Lower Versus Higher Red Meat Intake on Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes
- (2019) Dena Zeraatkar et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Reduction of Red and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Mortality and Incidence
- (2019) Mi Ah Han et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk for Cardiometabolic and Cancer Outcomes
- (2019) Robin W.M. Vernooij et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Meat Consumption and Health: Food for Thought
- (2019) Aaron E. Carroll et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations From the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium
- (2019) Bradley C. Johnston et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The IARC Monographs: Updated procedures for modern and transparent evidence synthesis in cancer hazard identification
- (2019) Jonathan M Samet et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Do We Really Need Another Time-Series Study of the PM2.5–Mortality Association?
- (2019) John R. Balmes NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- RE: “BEST PRACTICES FOR GAUGING EVIDENCE OF CAUSALITY IN AIR POLLUTION EPIDEMIOLOGY”
- (2018) Louis Anthony Cox AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis
- (2018) Josep-Maria Losilla et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Breast Implants and the Risk of Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma in the Breast
- (2018) Mintsje de Boer et al. JAMA Oncology
- Indirect adjustment of relative risks of an exposure with multiple categories for an unmeasured confounder
- (2018) Jay H. Lubin et al. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE
- (2018) Rebecca L. Morgan et al. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
- Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology
- (2017) Debbie A. Lawlor et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE Methods for Guideline Development: Time to Evolve?
- (2016) Susan L. Norris et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability to detect effects in systematic reviews of chemical exposures
- (2016) Glinda S. Cooper et al. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
- Raising the standard of systematic reviews published in Environment International
- (2016) Paul Whaley et al. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
- How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards
- (2016) Andrew A. Rooney et al. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
- Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions
- (2016) Peng Ding et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Causality and causal inference in epidemiology: the need for a pluralistic approach
- (2016) Jan P Vandenbroucke et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
- (2016) Jonathan AC Sterne et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Impact of Exposure Uncertainty on the Association between Perfluorooctanoate and Preeclampsia in the C8 Health Project Population
- (2015) Raghavendhran Avanasi et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes
- (2014) Tracey J. Woodruff et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Good practices for quantitative bias analysis
- (2014) T. L. Lash et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Carcinogenicity of perfluorooctanoic acid, tetrafluoroethylene, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, and 1,3-propane sultone
- (2014) Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Nonindustry-Sponsored Preclinical Studies on Statins Yield Greater Efficacy Estimates Than Industry-Sponsored Studies: A Meta-Analysis
- (2014) David Krauth et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Exposure-Response Estimates for Diesel Engine Exhaust and Lung Cancer Mortality Based on Data from Three Occupational Cohorts
- (2013) Roel Vermeulen et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study: A Cohort Mortality Study With Emphasis on Lung Cancer
- (2012) Michael D. Attfield et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study: A Nested Case-Control Study of Lung Cancer and Diesel Exhaust
- (2012) D. T. Silverman et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- A Meta-analysis of Asbestos and Lung Cancer: Is Better Quality Exposure Assessment Associated with Steeper Slopes of the Exposure–Response Relationships?
- (2011) Virissa Lenters et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Dealing With Dietary Measurement Error in Nutritional Cohort Studies
- (2011) Laurence S. Freedman et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Exposure to Diesel Motor Exhaust and Lung Cancer Risk in a Pooled Analysis from Case-Control Studies in Europe and Canada
- (2010) Ann C. Olsson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
- Occupational Benzene Exposure and the Risk of Lymphoma Subtypes: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies Incorporating Three Study Quality Dimensions
- (2010) Jelle Vlaanderen et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Negative Controls
- (2010) Marc Lipsitch et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
- (2010) Andreas Stang EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on cigarette smoking and liver cancer
- (2009) Yuan-Chin Amy Lee et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Addressing conflict in strategic literature reviews: disclosure is not enough: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?
- (2009) D. Michaels JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Industry-Sponsored Clinical Research
- (2008) Marcia Angell JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started