4.8 Article

Potential- and Buffer-Dependent Catalyst Decomposition during Nickel-Based Water Oxidation Catalysis

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages 5625-5631

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202001428

Keywords

electrocatalysis; electrochemistry; nanoparticles; nickel; water splitting

Funding

  1. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM) Funding Source: Medline
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of hydrogen by water electrolysis benefits from the development of water oxidation catalysts. This development process can be aided by the postulation of design rules for catalytic systems. The analysis of the reactivity of molecular complexes can be complicated by their decomposition under catalytic conditions into nanoparticles that may also be active. Such a misinterpretation can lead to incorrect design rules. In this study, the nickel-based water oxidation catalyst [Ni-II(meso-L)](ClO4)(2), which was previously thought to operate as a molecular catalyst, is found to decompose to form a NiO(x)layer in a pH 7.0 phosphate buffer under prolonged catalytic conditions, as indicated by controlled potential electrolysis, electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements. Interestingly, the formed NiO(x)layer desorbs from the surface of the electrode under less anodic potentials. Therefore, no nickel species can be detected on the electrode after electrolysis. Catalyst decomposition is strongly dependent on the pH and buffer, as there is no indication of NiO(x)layer formation at pH 6.5 in phosphate buffer nor in a pH 7.0 acetate buffer. Under these conditions, the activity stems from a molecular species, but currents are much lower. This study demonstrates the importance ofin situcharacterization methods for catalyst decomposition and metal oxide layer formation, and previously proposed design elements for nickel-based catalysts need to be revised.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available