4.7 Article

Efficient Tissue Culture Protocol for Magnolia lucida (Magnoliaceae) and Confirmation of Genetic Stability of the Regenerated Plants

Journal

PLANTS-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants9080997

Keywords

sterilization; shoot initiation; shoot proliferation; rooting; genetic fidelity assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. Forestry Public Welfare Industry Research of China [201404116]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670601]
  3. Forestry Science and Technology Innovation of Guangdong Province [2014KJCX006, 2017KJCX023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnolia lucida(Magnoliaceae) is classified as an endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. It has high commercial value owing to its attractive tree shape and flowers. We adopted an excellent genotype ofM. lucidaas the parent material and established a mini-cut orchard through grafting to provide trunk shoots explants over the long-term. Optimal sterilization was achieved using a combination of 75% ethanol for 30 s, one percent benzalkonium bromide for five minutes, and 0.1% mercuric chloride for five minutes. Modified Murashige and Skoog medium (ML) was the optimal medium for the growth ofM. lucida. Addition of one mg/L of 6-benzyl adenine (BA) and 0.05 mg/L of alpha-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) to the medium increased the shoot induction rate to 95.56%, and the ML medium containing 0.4 mg/L BA and 0.04 mg/L NAA achieved the maximum multiplication rate (284.56%). Dark treatment for seven days, followed by continuous light treatment could better resolve the challenge of difficult rooting inM. lucidaplants. Using random amplified polymorphic DNA and inter simple sequence repeat markers, we confirmed the genetic uniformity and stability of the regenerated plants. Our protocol should be helpful for the propagation and conservation of this endangered plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available