4.7 Article

Three birds with one stone: Lower volatile fatty acids (VFAs) reduction, higher phosphorus (P) removal, and lower alkali consumption via magnesium dosing after waste activated sludge (WAS) alkaline fermentation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 258, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120687

Keywords

Dosing methods; Magnesium chloride; Alkaline fermentation; Nutrient removal

Funding

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment
  2. Natural Science Found of Jiangsu Province [BK20190719]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708481]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661880]
  5. Natural Science Research of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [18KJB610013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnesium (120 mmol/L) was dosed to investigate the effects of different methods and times on performance of waste activated sludge (WAS) alkaline fermentation. The investigation revealed that maximum soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) was achieved without magnesium addition, indicating magnesium addition, regardless of dosing method or time, could constrain the sludge hydrolysis process. Fermented sludge dewaterability was improved with magnesium addition, as based on results of capillary suction time (CST) and bound water. The optimal magnesium dosage was reached following WAS alkaline fermentation, in which little volatile fatty acids (VFAs) reduction (67 mg COD/L), higher PO43--P removal efficiency (95.41%), and lower alkali consumption were achieved. Further, 682.19 mg chemical oxygen demand (COD)/L of the released protein was precipitated, suggesting that soluble protein was effectively recovered from sludge with magnesium addition after fermentation. In conclusion, dosing magnesium after WAS alkaline fermentation has multiple merits and warrants further study. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available