4.5 Article

Feasibility and acceptability of a nutritional intervention testing the effects of nitrate-rich beetroot juice and folic acid on blood pressure in Tanzanian adults with elevated blood pressure

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2020.1776226

Keywords

Acceptability; dietary nitrate; folate supplementation; hypertension; Tanzania

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council Confidence in Concept Funding scheme [MC_PC_16054]
  2. MRC [MR/N007921/1, MC_PC_16054] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of nitrate-rich beetroot and folate supplementation for reducing blood pressure in Tanzanian adults. The interventions were well accepted and had high compliance rates, with significant increases in nitrate and folate concentrations in plasma and saliva samples.
Sub-Saharan African countries are experiencing an alarming increase in hypertension prevalence. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of nitrate-rich beetroot and folate supplementation, alone or combined, for the reduction of blood pressure (BP) in Tanzanian adults with elevated BP. This was a three-arm double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel randomised clinical trial. Forty-eight participants were randomised to one of three groups to follow a specific 60-day intervention which included a: (1) combined intervention (beetroot juice + folate), (2) single intervention (beetroot juice + placebo), and (3) control group (nitrate-depleted beetroot juice + placebo). Forty-seven participants (age: 50-70 years) completed the study. The acceptability of the interventions was high. Self-reported compliance to the interventions was more than 90% which was confirmed by the significant increase in nitrate and folate concentrations in plasma and saliva samples in the treatment arms. This study provides important information for the design of high-nitrate interventions to reduce BP in Sub-Saharan African countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available