Systematic Review and Weight of Evidence are Integral to Ecological and Human Health Assessments: They Need an Integrated Framework
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Systematic Review and Weight of Evidence are Integral to Ecological and Human Health Assessments: They Need an Integrated Framework
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-03-21
DOI
10.1002/ieam.4271
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Data quality scoring system for microcosm and mesocosm studies used to derive a level of concern for atrazine
- (2018) Jeffrey M Giddings et al. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Weight of Evidence for Hazard Identification: A Critical Review of the Literature
- (2018) Pierre Martin et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy
- (2018) Christl A. Donnelly et al. NATURE
- Framework for assessing causality of air pollution-related health effects for reviews of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
- (2017) Elizabeth Oesterling Owens et al. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
- Conceptual model diagrams as evidence scaffolds for environmental assessment and management
- (2017) Susan B. Norton et al. Freshwater Science
- Conceptual model diagrams as evidence scaffolds for environmental assessment and management
- (2017) Susan B. Norton et al. Freshwater Science
- A weight-of-evidence approach for deriving a level of concern for atrazine that is protective of aquatic plant communities
- (2017) Dwayne RJ Moore et al. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
- Weight of evidence evaluation and systematic review in EU chemical risk assessment: Foundation is laid but guidance is needed
- (2016) Marlene Ågerstrand et al. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
- The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- (2016) JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS MILBANK QUARTERLY
- Key Characteristics of Carcinogens as a Basis for Organizing Data on Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis
- (2015) Martyn T. Smith et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Mode of action human relevance (species concordance) framework: Evolution of the Bradford Hill considerations and comparative analysis of weight of evidence
- (2014) M. E. Bette Meek et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY
- Hypothesis-Based Weight of Evidence: An Approach to Assessing Causation and its Application to Regulatory Toxicology
- (2014) Lorenz Rhomberg RISK ANALYSIS
- Evaluation of the causal framework used for setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards
- (2013) Julie E. Goodman et al. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY
- A survey of frameworks for best practices in weight-of-evidence analyses
- (2013) Lorenz R. Rhomberg et al. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY
- Causal Characteristics for Ecoepidemiology
- (2011) Susan M. Cormier et al. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
- Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: Review of qualitative and quantitative approaches
- (2009) Igor Linkov et al. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
- A “Weight-of-Evidence” Approach for the Integration of Environmental “Triad” Data to Assess Ecological Risk and Biological Vulnerability
- (2008) Alessandro Dagnino et al. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreFind the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
Search