Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Trials
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-05-12
DOI
10.1186/s13063-020-04305-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making: Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice
- (2019) Claudia L. Zeballos-Palacios et al. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
- Change implementation: the association of adaptive reserve and burnout among inpatient medicine physicians and nurses
- (2018) Christine Huynh et al. Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 2 - validation of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)
- (2018) Tracy L. Finch et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Impact of decision aids used during clinical encounters on clinician outcomes and consultation length: a systematic review
- (2018) Claudia Caroline Dobler et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- (2017) Marleen Kunneman et al. Trials
- Communication Skills Training for Physicians Improves Patient Satisfaction
- (2016) Adrienne Boissy et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- To be or not to be empathic: the combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice
- (2014) Martin Lamothe et al. BMC Family Practice
- Shared Decision Making: Examining Key Elements And Barriers To Adoption Into Routine Clinical Practice
- (2013) France Légaré et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- An Effort To Spread Decision Aids In Five California Primary Care Practices Yielded Low Distribution, Highlighting Hurdles
- (2013) Grace A. Lin et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol
- (2013) Tracy L Finch et al. Implementation Science
- Patchy ‘coherence’: using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC)
- (2013) Amy Lloyd et al. Implementation Science
- Concurrent Validity of Single-Item Measures of Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization in Burnout Assessment
- (2012) Colin P. West et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Patients’ and health professionals’ views and experiences of atrial fibrillation and oral-anticoagulant therapy: A qualitative meta-synthesis
- (2012) Christian Borg Xuereb et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores
- (2011) Michael T Brannick et al. MEDICAL EDUCATION
- Primary Care Practice Development: A Relationship-Centered Approach
- (2010) W. L. Miller et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice
- (2009) Glyn Elwyn et al. Implementation Science
- Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
- (2009) Carl R May et al. Implementation Science
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More