Patchy ‘coherence’: using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC)
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Patchy ‘coherence’: using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC)
Authors
Keywords
Shared decision making, Implementation, Patient-centered care, Normalization Process Theory
Journal
Implementation Science
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-09-05
DOI
10.1186/1748-5908-8-102
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Shared Decision Making: Examining Key Elements And Barriers To Adoption Into Routine Clinical Practice
- (2013) France Légaré et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- An Effort To Spread Decision Aids In Five California Primary Care Practices Yielded Low Distribution, Highlighting Hurdles
- (2013) Grace A. Lin et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Authoritarian Physicians And Patients’ Fear Of Being Labeled ‘Difficult’ Among Key Obstacles To Shared Decision Making
- (2012) Dominick L. Frosch et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Shared decision-making: enhancing the clinical relevance
- (2012) Vikki A Entwistle et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
- Option Grids: Shared decision making made easier
- (2012) Glyn Elwyn et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Understanding Patients' Experiences of Treatment Burden in Chronic Heart Failure Using Normalization Process Theory
- (2011) K. Gallacher et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- What does it take to have sustained use of decision aids? A programme evaluation for the Breast Cancer Initiative
- (2011) Sandra Feibelmann et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: A cross-over trial
- (2011) Heather L. Shepherd et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Clinicians’ concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making
- (2010) Lisa J.M. Caldon et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Conducting implementation research in community-based primary care: a qualitative study on integrating patient decision support interventions for cancer screening into routine practice
- (2009) Dominick L. Frosch et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice
- (2009) Glyn Elwyn et al. Implementation Science
- Implementing decision and communication aids to facilitate patient-centered care in breast cancer: A case study
- (2009) Jeffrey K. Belkora et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources
- (2008) Kerry A. Silvia et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions
- (2008) France Légaré et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started