Reading and interpreting reviews for health professionals: a practical review
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reading and interpreting reviews for health professionals: a practical review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-04-12
DOI
10.1007/s11739-020-02334-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Meta-analysis Metastasis
- (2019) Joshua D. Wallach JAMA Internal Medicine
- Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks
- (2019) Marina Krnic Martinic et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search
- (2018) Katharina Allers et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians
- (2016) Benjamin Rouse et al. Internal and Emergency Medicine
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
- (2016) JOHN P.A. IOANNIDIS MILBANK QUARTERLY
- The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
- (2015) Brian Hutton et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Why Systematic Review rather than Narrative Review?
- (2015) Chi-Un Pae Psychiatry Investigation
- PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews
- (2014) Abigail M Methley et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
- (2013) Jamie J Kirkham et al. Trials
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
- (2012) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
- (2011) Howard Balshem et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
- (2011) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2
- (2011) David C. Hoaglin et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2009) Alessandro Liberati et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started