4.6 Article

Vessel Segmentation of X-Ray Coronary Angiographic Image Sequence

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 1338-1348

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2936460

Keywords

X-ray angiograms; matrix decomposition model; Laplacian regularization; Hessian enhancement; hierarchical vessel; vessel video segmentation; energy optimization; vessel image

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [61702027]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission [Z171100000117022, KZ70001302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To facilitate the analysis and diagnosis of X-ray coronary angiography in interventional surgery, it is necessary to extract vessel from X-ray coronary angiography. However, vessel images of angiography suffer from low quality with large artefacts, which challenges the existing vascular technology. Methods: In this paper, we propose a avessel framework to detect vessels and segment vessels in angiographic vessel data. In this framework, we develop a new matrix decomposition model with gradient sparse in the tensor representation. Then, the energy function with the input of the hierarchical vessel is used in vessel detection and vessel segmentation. Results: Through experiments conducted on angiographic data, we have demonstrated the good performance of the proposed method in removing background structure. Conclusion: We evaluated our method for vessel detection and segmentation in different clinical settings, including LAO/RAO with cranial and caudal angulation, and showed its competitive results compared with eight state-of-the-art methods in terms of extensive qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Significance: Our method can remove a large number of background artefacts and obtain a better vascular structure, which has contributed to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available