An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 190806
Publisher
The Royal Society
Online
2020-02-19
DOI
10.1098/rsos.190806
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The preregistration revolution
- (2018) Brian A. Nosek et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles
- (2018) Heather Piwowar et al. PeerJ
- Populating the Data Ark: An attempt to retrieve, preserve, and liberate data from the most highly-cited psychology and psychiatry articles
- (2018) Tom E. Hardwicke et al. PLoS One
- Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journalCognition
- (2018) Tom E. Hardwicke et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Push button replication: Is impact evaluation evidence for international development verifiable?
- (2018) Benjamin D. K. Wood et al. PLoS One
- Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017
- (2018) Joshua D. Wallach et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Research portfolio analysis and topic prominence
- (2017) Richard Klavans et al. Journal of Informetrics
- (Un)Available upon Request: Field Experiment on Researchers' Willingness to Share Supplementary Materials
- (2017) Michal Krawczyk et al. Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
- (2016) C. F. Camerer et al. SCIENCE
- Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
- (2016) Shareen A. Iqbal et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency
- (2016) Mallory C. Kidwell et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Virtuous Cycle of a Data Ecosystem
- (2016) Bradley Voytek PLoS Computational Biology
- The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
- (2016) Richard D. Morey et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices
- (2015) John P. A. Ioannidis et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use
- (2015) Jayne F. Tierney et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer
- (2014) A. Franco et al. SCIENCE
- Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
- (2014) E. Miguel et al. SCIENCE
- The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age
- (2013) Timothy H. Vines et al. CURRENT BIOLOGY
- Public Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals
- (2011) Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali et al. PLoS One
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
- (2009) Iain Chalmers et al. LANCET
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science
- (2008) Neal S Young et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation