4.7 Article

Performance of Graphene-CdS Hybrid Nanocomposite Thin Film for Applications in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cell and H2 Production

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10020245

Keywords

Gr-CdS; cadmium sulfide; Cu(In; Ga)Se-2; buffer layer; water splitting

Funding

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2014R1A6A1031189]
  2. Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20174030201760]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agraphene-cadmium sulfide (Gr-CdS) nanocomposite was prepared by a chemical solution method, and its material properties were characterized by several analysis techniques. The synthesized pure CdS nanoparticles (NPs) and Gr-CdS nanocomposites were confirmed to have a stoichiometric atomic ratio (Cd/S = 1:1). The Cd 3d and S 2p peaks of the Gr-CdS nanocomposite appeared at lower binding energies compared to those of the pure CdS NPs according to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses. The formation of the Gr-CdS nanocomposite was also evidenced by the structural analysis using Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed that CdS NPs were uniformly distributed on the graphene sheets. The absorption spectra of both the Gr-CdS nanocomposite and pure CdS NPs thin films showed an absorption edge at 550 nm related to the energy band gap of CdS (similar to 2.42 eV). The Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 thin film photovoltaic device with Gr-CdS nanocomposite buffer layer showed a higher electrical conversion efficiency than that with pure CdS NPs thin film buffer layer. In addition, the water splitting efficiency of the Gr-CdS nanocomposite was almost three times higher than that of pure CdS NPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available