4.7 Article

Influence of electrolyte components on the microstructure and growth mechanism of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings on 1060 aluminum alloy

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 381, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125214

Keywords

Aluminum alloy; Plasma electrolytic oxidation; Electrolyte components; Microstructure; Growth mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51801094, 51361025]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20171BAB216006]
  3. Open Foundation of National Defense Key Discipline Laboratory of Light Alloy Processing Science and Technology, Nanchang Hangkong University [GG201980069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrolyte systems have a significant impact on plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO). In this work, the surface, aluminum/coating (A/C) interface and fracture cross-section microstructure and element distribution of PEO coatings prepared in silicate, phosphate and mixed electrolyte were characterized in detail by FESEM, EDS, XRD and XPS. The growth mechanisms of PEO coatings in different electrolytes were also discussed. Results demonstrated that the deposition of silicate dominated the growth of coating in silicate system, many loose nodules were present on the coating surface. Si element occupied almost the entire coating and was enriched at the nodules and cavity edges. In phosphate system, the growth of coating was primarily dependent on the oxidation of aluminum. There are a large number of hill-like protrusions at A/C interface. The main component of this coating was a-Al2O3, and a small amount of P was distributed at A/C interface. In the mixed electrolyte, the film-formation process was mainly the matrix oxidation, and supplemented by deposition of electrolytes. Meanwhile, the growth models of PEO coating in different electrolyte were established.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available