Is useful research data usually shared? An investigation of genome-wide association study summary statistics
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Is useful research data usually shared? An investigation of genome-wide association study summary statistics
Authors
Keywords
Genome-wide association studies, Genomics statistics, Epidemiological statistics, Genomic medicine, Human genomics, Genomics, Metaanalysis, Metadata
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages e0229578
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2020-02-22
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0229578
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings
- (2019) Mike Thelwall Journal of Informetrics
- The FAIR guiding principles for data stewardship: fair enough?
- (2018) Martin Boeckhout et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Informal data citation for data sharing and reuse is more common than formal data citation in biomedical fields
- (2018) Hyoungjoo Park et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019
- (2018) Annalisa Buniello et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Advantages of a Truly Open-Access Data-Sharing Model
- (2017) Monica M. Bertagnolli et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Data bibliometrics: metrics before norms
- (2017) David Stuart ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Do journal data sharing mandates work? Life sciences evidence from Dryad
- (2017) Mike Thelwall et al. Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Incorporating data sharing to the reward system of science
- (2017) Philippe Mongeon et al. Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Data set mentions and citations: A content analysis of full-text publications
- (2017) Mengnan Zhao et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- “You want the right amount of oversight”: interviews with data access committee members and experts on genomic data access
- (2016) Mahsa Shabani et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Is citizen science an open science in the case of biodiversity observations?
- (2016) Quentin Groom et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Research data explored: an extended analysis of citations and altmetrics
- (2016) Isabella Peters et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency
- (2016) Mallory C. Kidwell et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors
- (2015) Stephen Burgess et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits
- (2015) Brendan Bulik-Sullivan et al. NATURE GENETICS
- What Drives Academic Data Sharing?
- (2015) Benedikt Fecher et al. PLoS One
- Why data sharing should be the expected norm
- (2015) H. M. Krumholz BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Controlled Access under Review: Improving the Governance of Genomic Data Access
- (2015) Mahsa Shabani et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing?
- (2015) Dominique G. Roche et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Why data sharing should be the expected norm
- (2015) H. M. Krumholz BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index
- (2015) Nicolas Robinson-García et al. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists Worldwide
- (2015) Carol Tenopir et al. PLoS One
- Research Data in Core Journals in Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics
- (2015) Ryan P. Womack PLoS One
- Big data, open science and the brain: lessons learned from genomics
- (2014) Suparna Choudhury et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Big data from small data: data-sharing in the 'long tail' of neuroscience
- (2014) Adam R Ferguson et al. NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
- Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data
- (2014) Alyssa Goodman et al. PLoS Computational Biology
- Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species' geographic distributions
- (2013) Jan Beck et al. Ecological Informatics
- Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond
- (2013) Evangelos Evangelou et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology
- (2013) Jillian C. Wallis et al. PLoS One
- Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed
- (2013) Mark J. Costello et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Making data sharing work: The FCP/INDI experience
- (2012) Maarten Mennes et al. NEUROIMAGE
- Comprehensive literature review and statistical considerations for GWAS meta-analysis
- (2012) Ferdouse Begum et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Assessing and managing risk when sharing aggregate genetic variant data
- (2011) David W. Craig et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions
- (2011) Carol Tenopir et al. PLoS One
- The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing
- (2010) Emek Demir et al. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
- Prepublication data sharing
- (2009) NATURE
- Data sharing: Empty archives
- (2009) Bryn Nelson NATURE
- Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice
- (2009) Jane Kaye et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals
- (2009) Caroline J. Savage et al. PLoS One
- Why data-sharing policies matter
- (2009) A. E. Guttmacher et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Resolving Individuals Contributing Trace Amounts of DNA to Highly Complex Mixtures Using High-Density SNP Genotyping Microarrays
- (2008) Nils Homer et al. PLoS Genetics
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started