Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study
Authors
Keywords
Systematic reviews, Publication ethics, Metaanalysis, Scientific publishing, Health services research, Research quality assessment, Research reporting guidelines, Bibliometrics
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages e0227580
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2020-01-31
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0227580
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
- (2018) Long Ge et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A new typology for understanding context: qualitative exploration of the model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ)
- (2018) Julie E. Reed et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit
- (2017) Hedyeh Ziai et al. BMJ Open
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Statistical controversies in clinical research: Publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews
- (2016) D. Herrmann et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Methods for detecting, quantifying, and adjusting for dissemination bias in meta-analysis are described
- (2016) Katharina Felicitas Mueller et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study
- (2016) Matthew J. Page et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Interventions to improve adherence to cardiovascular disease guidelines: a systematic review
- (2015) Rebecca A. Jeffery et al. BMC Family Practice
- The reporting characteristics and methodological quality of Cochrane reviews about health policy research
- (2015) Li Xiu-xia et al. HEALTH POLICY
- Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
- (2014) F Song et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review
- (2013) Kerry Dwan et al. PLoS One
- Interventions to improve teamwork and communications among healthcare staff
- (2011) P. McCulloch et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
- Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: Framing the Questions
- (2011) Kabir Sheikh et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Building the Field of Health Policy and Systems Research: An Agenda for Action
- (2011) Sara Bennett et al. PLOS MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now