4.3 Article

Variation in stiffness regulates cardiac myocyte hypertrophy via signaling pathways

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 1178-1186

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/cjpp-2015-0578

Keywords

mechano-transduction; focal adhesion kinase; lipid signaling; actin assembly; substrate stiffness

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH HL62426]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Much diseased human myocardial tissue is fibrotic and stiff, which increases the work that the ventricular myocytes must perform to maintain cardiac output. The hypothesis tested is that the increased load due to greater stiffness of the substrata drives sarcomere assembly of cells, thus strengthening them. Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVM) were cultured on polyacrylamide or polydimethylsiloxane substrates with stiffness of 10 kPa, 100 kPa, or 400 kPa, or glass with stiffness of 61.9 GPa. Cell size increased with stiffness. Two signaling pathways were explored, phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (p-FAK) and lipids by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2). Subcellular distributions of both were determined in the sarcomeric fraction by antibody localization, and total amounts were measured by Western or dot blotting, respectively. More p-FAK and PIP2 distributed to the sarcomeres of NRVM grown on stiffer substrates. Actin assembly involves the actin capping protein Z (CapZ). Both actin and CapZ dynamic exchange were significantly increased on stiffer substrates when assessed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of green fluorescent protein tags. Blunting of actin FRAP by FAK inhibition implicates linkage from mechano-signalling pathways to cell growth. Thus, increased stiffness of cardiac disease can be modeled with polymeric materials to understand how the microenvironment regulates cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available