4.6 Article

Super-resolution single-photon imaging at 8.2 kilometers

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 4076-4087

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.383456

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development (R&D) Plan of China [2018YFB0504300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771443]
  3. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies [AHY140000]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Thousand Young Talent Program
  6. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Funds [18JC1414700]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2340000083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single-photon light detection and ranging (LiDAR), offering single-photon sensitivity and picosecond time resolution, has been widely adopted for active imaging applications. Longrange active imaging is a great challenge, because the spatial resolution degrades significantly with the imaging range due to the diffraction limit of the optics, and only weak echo signal photons can return but mixed with a strong background noise. Here we propose and demonstrate a photon-efficient LiDAR approach that can achieve sub-Rayleigh resolution imaging over long ranges. This approach exploits line sub-pixel scanning and a deconvolution algorithm tailored to this long-range application. Using this approach, we experimentally demonstrated active three-dimensional (3D) single-photon imaging by recognizing different postures of a mannequin model at a stand-off distance of 8.2 km in both daylight and night. The observed spatial (transversal) resolution is similar to 5.5 cm at 8.2 km, which is about twice of the system's resolution. This also beats the optical system's Rayleigh criterion. The results are valuable for geosciences and target recognition over long ranges. (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available