4.5 Article

High-resolution quantification of discrete phagocytic events by live cell time-lapse high-content microscopy imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 133, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.237883

Keywords

Phagocytosis; Macrophage; High-content imaging; Phagolysosome; Time-lapse video; Quantification

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI114554]
  2. Acerta Pharma LLC [005656]
  3. University of Rochester
  4. University of Rochester Immunology Training T32 Grant from NIH [AI007285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phagocytosis is a dynamic process central to immunity and tissue homeostasis. Current methods for quantification of phagocytosis largely rely on indirect or static measurements, such as target clearance or dye uptake, and thus provide limited information about engulfment rates or target processing. Improved kinetic measurements of phagocytosis could provide useful, basic insights in many areas. We present a live-cell, time-lapse and high-content microscopy imaging method based on the detection and quantification of fluorescent dye 'voids' within phagocytes that result from target internalization to quantify phagocytic events with high temporal resolution. Using this method, we measure target cell densities and antibody concentrations needed for optimal antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis. We compare void formation and dye uptake methods for phagocytosis detection, and examine the connection between target cell engulfment and phagolysosomal processing. We demonstrate how this approach can be used to measure distinct forms of phagocytosis, and changes in macrophage morphology during phagocytosis related to both engulfment and target degradation. Our results provide a high-resolution method for quantifying phagocytosis that provides opportunities to better understand the cellular and molecular regulation of this fundamental biological process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available