4.5 Article

AKT but not MYC promotes reactive oxygen species-mediated cell death in oxidative culture

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 133, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.239277

Keywords

MYC; Metabolomics; Oncogene; PI3K/AKT signaling; Proteomics; Reactive oxygen species

Categories

Funding

  1. Margaret E. Early Medical Research Trust
  2. Rose Hills Foundation
  3. USC Provost's Office
  4. Viterbi School of Engineering
  5. Mork Family Doctoral Fellowship
  6. USC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oncogenes can create metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer cells. We tested how AKT (herein referring to AKT1) and MYC affect the ability of cells to shift between respiration and glycolysis. Using immortalized mammary epithelial cells, we discovered that constitutively active AKT, but not MYC, induced cell death in galactose culture, where cells rely on oxidative phosphorylation for energy generation. However, the negative effects of AKT were temporary, and AKT-expressing cells recommenced growth after similar to 15 days in galactose. To identify the mechanisms regulating AKT-mediated cell death, we used metabolomics and found that AKT-expressing cells that were dying in galactose culture had upregulated glutathione metabolism. Proteomic profiling revealed that AKT-expressing cells dying in galactose also upregulated nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, a marker of sensitivity to oxidative stress. We therefore measured levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and discovered that galactose-induced ROS exclusively in cells expressing AKT. Furthermore, ROS were required for galactose-induced death of AKT-expressing cells. We then confirmed that galactose-induced ROS-mediated cell death in breast cancer cells with upregulated AKT signaling. These results demonstrate that AKT but not MYC restricts the flexibility of cancer cells to use oxidative phosphorylation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available