Generalized F‐discrepancy‐based point selection strategy for dependent random variables in uncertainty quantification of nonlinear structures
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Generalized F‐discrepancy‐based point selection strategy for dependent random variables in uncertainty quantification of nonlinear structures
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-12-04
DOI
10.1002/nme.6277
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Error estimate of point selection in uncertainty quantification of nonlinear structures involving multiple nonuniformly distributed parameters
- (2019) Jianbing Chen et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING
- Copula-based decomposition approach for the derivative-based sensitivity of variance contributions with dependent variables
- (2018) Pan Wang et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- A general framework for data-driven uncertainty quantification under complex input dependencies using vine copulas
- (2018) Emiliano Torre et al. PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS
- Reliability analysis of active tendon-controlled wind turbines by a computationally efficient wavelet-based probability density evolution method
- (2017) Weifeng Tao et al. Structural Control & Health Monitoring
- A general framework for the estimation of analytical fragility functions based on multivariate probability distributions
- (2017) Irmela Zentner STRUCTURAL SAFETY
- STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR STRUCTURES WITH GENERAL NONUNIFORM RANDOM PARAMETERS BY MINIMIZING GL2-DISCREPANCY
- (2016) Jianbing Chen et al. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering
- MULTISCALE STOCHASTIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS TOWARD RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR LARGE COMPLEX REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
- (2016) Hao Zhou et al. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering
- A GF-discrepancy for point selection in stochastic seismic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters
- (2016) Jianbing Chen et al. STRUCTURAL SAFETY
- A Vine-Copula-Based Reliability Analysis Method for Structures With Multidimensional Correlation
- (2015) C. Jiang et al. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
- Nonlinear stochastic seismic analysis of buried pipeline systems
- (2015) Wei Liu et al. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
- Multi-variate seismic demand modelling using copulas: Application to non-ductile reinforced concrete frame in Victoria, Canada
- (2015) Katsuichiro Goda et al. STRUCTURAL SAFETY
- Copula-based approaches for evaluating slope reliability under incomplete probability information
- (2015) Xiao-Song Tang et al. STRUCTURAL SAFETY
- Modeling Dependence with C- and D-Vine Copulas: TheRPackageCDVine
- (2015) Eike Christian Brechmann et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Improving Point Selection in Cubature by a New Discrepancy
- (2013) Jianbing Chen et al. SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
- Stochastic seismic response analysis of structures exhibiting high nonlinearity
- (2010) Jian-bing Chen et al. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES
- Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression
- (2010) Géraud Blatman et al. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
- Statistical modeling of joint probability distribution using copula: Application to peak and permanent displacement seismic demands
- (2009) K. Goda STRUCTURAL SAFETY
- Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence
- (2007) Kjersti Aas et al. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS
- Partition of the probability-assigned space in probability density evolution analysis of nonlinear stochastic structures
- (2007) Jian-Bing Chen et al. PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started