How bugs are born: a model to identify how bugs are introduced in software components
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How bugs are born: a model to identify how bugs are introduced in software components
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-02-04
DOI
10.1007/s10664-019-09781-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The smell of fear: on the relation between test smells and flaky tests
- (2019) Fabio Palomba et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Not all bugs are the same: Understanding, characterizing, and classifying bug types
- (2019) Gemma Catolino et al. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
- On the Impact of Programming Languages on Code Quality
- (2019) Emery D. Berger et al. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS
- Reproducibility and credibility in empirical software engineering: A case study based on a systematic literature review of the use of the SZZ algorithm
- (2018) Gema Rodríguez-Pérez et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- A Framework for Evaluating the Results of the SZZ Approach for Identifying Bug-Introducing Changes
- (2017) Daniel Alencar da Costa et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- FRLink: Improving the recovery of missing issue-commit links by revisiting file relevance
- (2017) Yan Sun et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- Replicating and Re-Evaluating the Theory of Relative Defect-Proneness
- (2015) Mark D. Syer et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- The Design Space of Bug Fixes and How Developers Navigate It
- (2015) Emerson Murphy-Hill et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- An exploratory study on exception handling bugs in Java programs
- (2015) Felipe Ebert et al. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE
- Automatic, high accuracy prediction of reopened bugs
- (2014) Xin Xia et al. Automated Software Engineering
- An Empirical Methodology to Evaluate Vulnerability Discovery Models
- (2014) Fabio Massacci et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Why software repositories are not used for defect-insertion circumstance analysis more often: A case study
- (2014) Lutz Prechelt et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- Bug characteristics in open source software
- (2013) Lin Tan et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Studying the laws of software evolution in a long-lived FLOSS project
- (2013) Jesus M. Gonzalez-Barahona et al. Journal of Software-Evolution and Process
- Studying re-opened bugs in open source software
- (2012) Emad Shihab et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Studying the impact of social interactions on software quality
- (2012) Nicolas Bettenburg et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Whole Test Suite Generation
- (2012) Gordon Fraser et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- A large-scale empirical study of just-in-time quality assurance
- (2012) Yasutaka Kamei et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Studying the co-evolution of production and test code in open source and industrial developer test processes through repository mining
- (2010) Andy Zaidman et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Fault-prone module detection using large-scale text features based on spam filtering
- (2009) Hideaki Hata et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Change impact graphs: Determining the impact of prior codechanges
- (2009) Daniel M. German et al. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
- Toward an understanding of bug fix patterns
- (2008) Kai Pan et al. EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
- Classifying Software Changes: Clean or Buggy?
- (2008) Sunghun Kim et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started