4.6 Article

Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess activities and participation in people with systemic sclerosis: the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue 4, Pages 710-718

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18922

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique) [AOR-10050]
  2. French Society of Rheumatology
  3. Groupe Francophone de Recherche sur la Sclerodermie (Bourse 2018 du GFRS)
  4. Fonds de Recherche Quebec - Sante researcher award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) aimed at assessing people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have rarely involved the target population in the item- and domain-generation stage of the instrument construction. Objectives To develop a new PROM assessing activities and participation in people with SSc. Methods A provisional International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based 65-item questionnaire previously developed from interviews of people with SSc was sent by email to all patients followed in the internal medicine department of Cochin hospital (n = 184) and enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort. Items were reduced according to their metric properties. Dimensional structure of the questionnaire was assessed by principal component analysis, convergent and divergent validities by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha, and reliability by a test-retest method using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Results Overall, 113 of 184 patients (61 center dot 4%) completed the provisional questionnaire. The item-reduction process resulted in a 17-item questionnaire, the Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional scale (CSF-17). Principal component analysis extracted two dimensions: 10 items related to mobility (CSF-17 section A) and seven items related to general tasks (CSF-17 section B). We observed convergent validity of the CSF-17 total score with global activity limitation, pain, depression and aesthetic burden, and divergent validity with anxiety. Cronbach's alpha was 0 center dot 94 for section A and 0 center dot 95 for section B. ICC (n = 25 patients) was 0 center dot 92 for the CSF-17 total score. Bland-Altman analysis did not reveal a systematic trend for the test-retest. Conclusions The CSF-17 is a new PROM assessing activities and participation specifically in people with SSc. Its content and construct validities are very high. What is already known about this topic? In the earliest stages of construction patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) for people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) rarely involve the target population. Instruments able to capture the specific needs of people with SSc in terms of activities and participation are lacking. What does this study add? The Cochin 17-item Scleroderma Functional Scale (CSF-17) is a new PROM assessing global activities and participation specifically in people with SSc. Patients' perspectives were prioritized at all stages of construction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients' and Practitioners' Views

Sophie Alami, Lucile Hervouet, Serge Poiraudeau, Karine Briot, Christian Roux

PLOS ONE (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Patients', relatives', and practitioners' views of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A qualitative study

Sophie Alami, Vincent Cottin, Luc Mouthon, Dominique Desjeux, Esther Quessette, Serge Poiraudeau, Olivier Sitbon

PRESSE MEDICALE (2016)

Article Rheumatology

Elaboration and validation of a questionnaire assessing patient expectations about management of knee osteoarthritis by their physicians: the Knee Osteoarthritis Expectations Questionnaire

Mathilde Benhamou, Isabelle Boutron, Marie Dalichampt, Gabriel Baron, Sophie Alami, Francois Rannou, Philippe Ravaud, Serge Poiraudeau

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES (2013)

Article Orthopedics

Management of pain induced by exercise and mobilization during physical therapy programs: views of patients and care providers

Sophie Alami, Dominique Desjeux, Marie Martine Lefevre-Colau, Anne Sophie Boisgard, Eric Boccard, Francois Rannou, Serge Poiraudeau

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2011)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Patients' and Practitioners' Views of Knee Osteoarthritis and Its Management: A Qualitative Interview Study

Sophie Alami, Isabelle Boutron, Dominique Desjeux, Monique Hirschhorn, Gwendoline Meric, Francois Rannou, Serge Poiraudeau

PLOS ONE (2011)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Fears and Beliefs of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: The Knee Osteoarthritis Fears and Beliefs Questionnaire (KOFBeQ)

Mathilde Benhamou, Gabriel Baron, Marie Dalichampt, Isabelle Boutron, Sophie Alami, Francois Rannou, Philippe Ravaud, Serge Poiraudeau

PLOS ONE (2013)

Article Rheumatology

Construction of an ICF core set and ICF-based questionnaire assessing activities and participation in patients with systemic sclerosis

Agathe Papelard, Camille Daste, Sophie Alami, Katherine Sanchez, Alexandra Roren, Francois Segretin, Marie-Martine Lefevre-Colau, Francois Rannou, Luc Mouthon, Serge Poiraudeau, Christelle Nguyen

RHEUMATOLOGY (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment vs Sham Treatment on Activity Limitations in Patients With Nonspecific Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain A Randomized Clinical Trial

Christelle Nguyen, Isabelle Boutron, Rafael Zegarra-Parodi, Gabriel Baron, Sophie Alami, Katherine Sanchez, Camille Daste, Margaux Boisson, Laurent Fabre, Peggy Krief, Guillaume Krief, Marie-Martine Lefevre-Colau, Francois Rannou

Summary: This study compared the efficacy of standard osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) with sham OMT in reducing low back pain (LBP) specific activity limitations in patients with nonspecific subacute or chronic LBP. Results showed that standard OMT had a small effect on reducing LBP-specific activity limitations compared to sham OMT, but the clinical relevance of this effect is questionable.

JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Orthopedics

Patients' views and needs about systemic sclerosis and its management: a qualitative interview study

Luc Mouthon, Sophie Alami, Anne-Sophie Boisard, Benjamin Chaigne, Eric Hachulla, Serge Poiraudeau

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2017)

No Data Available