Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?
Authors
Keywords
Systematic reviews, Network meta-analysis, Evidence-based medicine, Knowledge translation, Clinical practice guidelines, GRADE
Journal
BMC Medicine
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-03-30
DOI
10.1186/s12916-016-0596-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer
- (2016) Perrine Créquit et al. BMC Medicine
- Trustworthy guidelines – excellent; customized care tools – even better
- (2015) Glyn Elwyn et al. BMC Medicine
- Development of a Novel, Multilayered Presentation Format for Clinical Practice Guidelines
- (2015) Annette Kristiansen et al. CHEST
- Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens
- (2015) T. Agoritsas et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens
- (2015) T. Agoritsas et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste
- (2014) Malcolm R Macleod et al. LANCET
- Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis
- (2014) Georgia Salanti et al. PLoS One
- A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis
- (2014) M. A. Puhan et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap
- (2014) Julian H. Elliott et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Trustworthy Clinical Guidelines
- (2013) Christine Laine et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Creating Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust, Use, and Share
- (2013) Per Olav Vandvik et al. CHEST
- Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results
- (2013) Shaun Treweek et al. Implementation Science
- GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
- (2013) Jeffrey C. Andrews et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool
- (2012) Georgia Salanti Research Synthesis Methods
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
- (2011) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Going from evidence to recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now