Pituitary surgery’s epidemiology using a national inpatient database in Japan
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Pituitary surgery’s epidemiology using a national inpatient database in Japan
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-03-03
DOI
10.1007/s00701-020-04270-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Gross total resection of pituitary adenomas after endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a meta-analysis
- (2018) Reem D. Almutairi et al. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
- Clinical features and outcomes of tetanus: Analysis using a National Inpatient Database in Japan
- (2018) Mikio Nakajima et al. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
- Endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2018) Leonie H. A. Broersen et al. Pituitary
- Costs in Pituitary Surgery: Racial, Socioeconomic, and Hospital Factors
- (2018) Alan Workman et al. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B-Skull Base
- Consensus on Postoperative Recommendations After Transsphenoidal Surgery
- (2018) Jürgen Honegger et al. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES
- A Survey on Pituitary Surgery in Italy
- (2018) Domenico Solari et al. World Neurosurgery
- Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data
- (2017) Hayato Yamana et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Recent Evolution of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas
- (2017) Hiroshi NISHIOKA NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA
- Comparison of Complications, Trends, and Costs in Endoscopic vs Microscopic Pituitary Surgery: Analysis From a US Health Claims Database
- (2017) Anthony O. Asemota et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Endoscopic Endonasal versus Microsurgical Transsphenoidal Approach for Growth Hormone–Secreting Pituitary Adenomas—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2017) Kevin Phan et al. World Neurosurgery
- Comparative Cost Analysis of Endoscopic versus Microscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas
- (2017) Chikezie Eseonu et al. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B-Skull Base
- Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on Surgical Techniques and Technologies for the Management of Patients With Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas
- (2016) John S. Kuo et al. NEUROSURGERY
- Endoscopic versus microscopic approach for surgical treatment of acromegaly
- (2015) Hussein Fathalla et al. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW
- Fascia patchwork closure for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery
- (2015) Yudo Ishii et al. NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW
- Nationwide shift from microscopic to endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery
- (2015) John D. Rolston et al. Pituitary
- Outcomes of Argatroban Treatment in Patients With Atherothrombotic Stroke
- (2015) Tomoki Wada et al. STROKE
- Evidence-based clinical management and utilization of new technology in European neurosurgery
- (2013) Clemens Weber et al. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
- Endoscopic vs Microsurgical Transsphenoidal Surgery for Acromegaly: Outcomes in a Concurrent Series of Patients Using Modern Criteria For Remission
- (2013) Robert M. Starke et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
- Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2012) M. Ammirati et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
- The role of outcomes data for assessing the expertise of a pituitary surgeon
- (2011) Kiarash Shahlaie et al. Current Opinion in Endocrinology Diabetes and Obesity
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started