4.7 Review

Incorporating social aspects in sustainable supply chains: Trends and future directions

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 237, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.331

Keywords

Sustainable supply chains; Social sustainability; Systematic literature review

Funding

  1. CNPq - National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [247671/2013-4GDE]
  2. Portuguese National Science Foundation (FCT) [PTDC/AGR-FOR/2178/2014, PTDC/EGEOGE/28071/2017, Lisboa -01.0145-Feder-28071]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/AGR-FOR/2178/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The social dimension of sustainability in supply chains has grown in importance in both academic and industrial communities. This article aims to understand how social dimension has been incorporated in supply chain management research in the past years and what research gaps still exist. For this purpose, a systematic literature review is performed where 621 articles are analysed considering a set of categories that include: research methodology; social dimension; social analysis focus; supply chain entities; traceability and transparency; uncertainty and risk; industrial activity sector. A cross-analysis between categories is presented, revealing that social sustainability concerns have been increasingly addressed along the years, but further research still needs to be performed to achieve more inclusive social supply chains. N-Vivo Software is used to perform the content analysis. The main research gaps and trends regarding social concerns in supply chains are identified and systematised into a framework that can be used to integrate social aspects in supply chains. Based on the latter, a research agenda is defined targeting concerned researchers and practitioners to attain the sustainable supply chains. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available