4.5 Article

High conductivity and high density SrCe0.5Zr0.35Y0.1A0.05O3-δ (A = Gd, Sm) proton-conducting electrolytes for IT-SOFCs

Journal

IONICS
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 1297-1305

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-019-03278-w

Keywords

Proton-conducting electrolyte; Sr-based perovskites; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; IT-SOFC

Funding

  1. Universiti Brunei Darussalam graduate scholarship [UBD/OVAORI/CRGWG(006)/161201]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130012822] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel Sr-based perovskite electrolyte, SrCe0.5Zr0.35Y0.1Gd0.05O3-delta, was successfully synthesized and characterized in comparison with SrCe0.5Zr0.35Y0.1Sm0.05O3-delta for possible use in proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. Indexing and subsequent Rietveld refinement confirm that both materials crystallize in the orthorhombic symmetry with Pbnm space group. Scanning electron microscopy images show the highly dense structure with the relative densities of 96% and 97% for Gd and Sm-doped sample, respectively. Electrochemical impedance measurements in wet 5% hydrogen at 700 degrees C shows that the conductivity of SrCe0.5Zr0.35Y0.1Gd0.05O3-delta and SrCe0.5Zr0.35Y0.1Sm0.05O3-delta were 5.701 x10(-3) S cm(-1) and 5.257 x 10(-3) S cm(-1), respectively. The ionic conductivities of both samples increase in the wet hydrogen compared with that of dry hydrogen atmosphere. This indicates the enhancement of protonic conduction mechanism from introducing water in electrochemical impedance measurement. The proton conduction takes place at a lower temperature than conventional solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) which makes SrCe0.5Zr0.35Y0.1(Gd/Sm)(0.05)O3-delta good electrolytes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell (IT-SOFC).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available