4.4 Article

Bradyrhizobium sp. enhance ureide metabolism increasing peanuts yield

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 202, Issue 3, Pages 645-656

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-019-01778-x

Keywords

Arachis hypogaea L; Growth-promoting bacteria; Nitrogen metabolism; Seed inoculation; Photosynthetic pigments

Categories

Funding

  1. Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
  2. CAPES)
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [309380/2017-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. and co-inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense. The seed treatments were as follows: control (without inoculation); A. brasilense (2 mL per kg(-1) of seed); A. brasilense (4 mL per kg(-1) of seed); Bradyrhizobium sp. (2 mL per kg(-1) of seed); Bradyrhizobium sp. (4 mL per kg(-1) of seed); A. brasilense + Bradyrhizobium sp. (2 mL of each strain per kg(-1) of seed); and A. brasilense + Bradyrhizobium sp. (4 mL of each strain per kg(-1) of seed). Peanut plants from seeds inoculated with Bradyrhizobium sp. and A. brasilense exhibited highest leaf concentration of photosynthetic pigments, carotenoids, nitrate, ammonia and amino acids. The inoculation of seeds with Bradyrhizobium sp. resulted in plants with increased concentrations of total soluble sugars, and ureides compared to the untreated plants. In contrast, seeds treated with A. brasilense alone resulted in plants exhibiting highest concentration of amino acids, which represent the highest concentration of nitrogen compounds in peanut plants. Seed inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. at a rate of 2 mL kg(-1) was identified as the best treatment to promote increased biological nitrogen fixation and generate higher peanut yields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available