4.6 Article

Evaluation of photon attenuation and optical characterizations of bismuth lead borate glasses modified by TiO2

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-019-3023-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study of photon attenuation and optical properties was performed for (20Bi(2)O(3)-60B(2)O(3)-(20-y)PbO-yTiO(2)), where y=0.0, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0wt%) glassy system. UV-Vis absorption measurements for the glasses in the range of 90-1100nm wavelengths have been recorded. Based on the absorption spectra, the band gap of optical energy for each glass sample has been evaluated using absorbance spectrum fitting (EOpticalASF) and derivative absorbance spectrum fitting (EOpticalDASF) models and compared with those obtained by Tauc's method. EOpticalASF varies from 2.405 to 2.008eV, while EOpticalDASF takes values from 3.000 to 2.914eV. Indeed, different optical parameters such as refractive index, molar polarizability, molar refractivity, metallization criterion, dielectric constants, optical transmission, reflection loss, band gap of optical energy-based metallization criterion, and refractive index-based metallization criterion have been evaluated. Moreover, several shielding parameters such as mass attenuation coefficients, linear attenuation coefficient, half-value layer, tenth-value layer, mean free path, effective atomic numbers, and effective electron densities have been evaluated using the WinXCOM program in the energy range 0.010-15MeV for the prepared glass system. At 1MeV photon energy, the half value layer for the investigated glasses takes values from 2.03 to 2.15cm. The results showed that the studied glasses can be applied as candidate for radiation shielding materials according to their coefficients of mass attenuation and HVL values, especially the composition with the highest value of PbO (20 wt%), which introduced good nuclear radiation shielding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available