4.8 Article

Defect-Cluster-Boosted Solar Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting by n-Cu2O Thin Films Prepared Through Anisotropic Crystal Growth

Journal

CHEMSUSCHEM
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages 4859-4865

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201901798

Keywords

copper; crystal growth; defects; photoelectrochemistry; water splitting

Funding

  1. National Science Council
  2. National Dong Hwa University [MOST 105-2221-E-259-024-MY3, MOST 107-2221-E-259-029-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anisotropic growth of Cu2O crystals deposited on an indium-doped tin oxide-coated glass substrate through facile electrodeposition and low-temperature calcination results in favorable solar photoelectrochemical water splitting. XRD, TEM, and SEM reveal that appreciable oxygen vacancies are populated in the Cu2O crystals with a highly branched dendritic thin film morphology, which are further substituted by Cu atoms to form Cu antisite defects exclusively along the [111] direction. The post-thermal treatment presumably accelerates such migration of the lattice imperfections, favoring the exposure of the catalytically active (111) facets. The Cu2O thin film derived in this way shows n-type conduction with a donor concentration in the order of 10(17) cm(-3) and a flat-band potential of -1.19 V vs. Ag/AgCl, which is also confirmed by Mott-Schottky analysis. The material is employed as a photoanode and delivers a photocurrent density of 2.2 mA cm(-2) at a potential of 0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl, surpassing reported values more than twofold. Such superiority mostly originates from the synergism of the selective facet exposure within the Cu2O crystals, which have decent crystallinity, as shown by Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy, and a favorable bandgap of 2.1 eV, as confirmed by UV/Vis spectroscopy. The n-type Cu2O thin film reported herein holds excellent promise for solar-related applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available