4.7 Article

Molybdenum Disulfide Quantum Dots Prepared by Bipolar-Electrode Electrochemical Scissoring

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano9060906

Keywords

molybdenum disulfide; bipolar-electrode; electrochemical method; quantum dots; electromagnetic wave absorption

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21575071, 21874079]
  2. Nature Science Foundation for Outstanding Young Scientists of Shandong Province [ZR2018JL011]
  3. Science & Technology Fund Planning Project of Shandong Colleges and Universities [J16LA13]
  4. Qingdao Science & Technology Planning Project [17-6-3-15-gx]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A convenient bipolar-electrode (BPE) electrochemical method was engineered to produce molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) quantum dots (QDs) using pure phosphate buffer (PBS) as the electrolyte and the MoS2 powder as the precursor. Meanwhile, the corresponding by-product precipitate was studied, in which MoS2 nanosheets were observed. The BPE design would not be restricted by the shape and size of the MoS2 precursor. It could lead to the defect generation and 2H -> 1T phase variation of the MoS2, resulting in the formation of nanosheets and finally the QDs. The as-prepared MoS2 QDs exhibited high photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield of 13.9% and average lateral size of 4.4 +/- 0.2 nm, respectively. Their excellent PL property, low cytotoxicity, and good aqueous dispersion offer promising applicability in PL staining and cell imaging. Meanwhile, the as-obtained byproduct containing the nanosheets could be used as an effective electromagnetic wave (EMW) absorber. The minimum reflection loss (RL) value was -54.13 dB at the thickness of 3.3 mm. The corresponding bandwidth with efficient attenuation (<-10 dB) was up to 7.04 GHz (8.8-15.84 GHz). The as-obtained EMW performance was far superior over most previously reported MoS2-based nanomaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available