Pandora's pregnancy: NIPT, CMA, and genome sequencing—A new era for prenatal genetic testing
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Pandora's pregnancy: NIPT, CMA, and genome sequencing—A new era for prenatal genetic testing
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-06-04
DOI
10.1002/pd.5495
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Risks and Recommendations in Prenatally Detected De Novo Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements from Assessment of Long-Term Outcomes
- (2018) Christina Halgren et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Pregnant Genetic Counselors in an Era of Advanced Genomic Tests: What Do the Experts Test Prenatally?
- (2018) Shiri Shkedi-Rafid et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Joint Position Statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Perinatal Quality Foundation (PQF) on the use of genome-wide sequencing for fetal diagnosis
- (2018) et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- ACOG and SMFM guidelines for prenatal diagnosis: Is karyotyping really sufficient?
- (2018) Sara B. Hay et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- The physician–patient relationship in the age of precision medicine
- (2018) Gil Eyal et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Realizing responsibility. Institutional routines, critical intervention, and the “big” questions in the controversy over non-invasive prenatal testing in Germany
- (2018) Kathrin Braun et al. NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY
- Health professionals' and researchers' perspectives on prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing: 'We can't shut the door now, the genie's out, we need to refine it'
- (2018) Ruth Horn et al. PLoS One
- Choosing between Higher and Lower Resolution Microarrays: do Pregnant Women Have Sufficient Knowledge to Make Informed Choices Consistent with their Attitude?
- (2017) S. L. van der Steen et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing
- (2017) Ruth Horn et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing
- (2017) Sunayna Best et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- “They Can't Find Anything Wrong with Him, Yet”: Mothers’ experiences of parenting an infant with a prenatally diagnosed copy number variant (CNV)
- (2016) Allison Werner-Lin et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- The use of chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis
- (2016) Lorraine Dugoff et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Anthony R. Gregg et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- The Psychological Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Disclosure of Susceptibility Loci: First Impressions of Parents’ Experiences
- (2016) S. L. van der Steen et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- What results to disclose, when, and who decides? Healthcare professionals' views on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis
- (2016) Shiri Shkedi-Rafid et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Prenatal whole exome sequencing: the views of clinicians, scientists, genetic counsellors and patient representatives
- (2016) Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Expectation versus Reality: The Impact of Utility on Emotional Outcomes after Returning Individualized Genetic Research Results in Pediatric Rare Disease Research, a Qualitative Interview Study
- (2016) Cara N. Cacioppo et al. PLoS One
- The time-consuming demands of the practice of medical genetics in the era of advanced genomic testing
- (2015) Rivka Sukenik-Halevy et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Cell-free DNA Analysis for Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy
- (2015) Mary E. Norton et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Whole-genome array as a first-line cytogenetic test in prenatal diagnosis
- (2015) M. I. Srebniak et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening
- (2014) Rachèl V van Schendel et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Counseling Challenges with Variants of Uncertain Significance and Incidental Findings in Prenatal Genetic Screening and Diagnosis
- (2014) Lauren Westerfield et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Personalized medicine and genetic malpractice
- (2013) Gary E. Marchant et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- How does altering the resolution of chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal setting affect the rates of pathological and uncertain findings?
- (2013) S. C. Hillman et al. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) S. C. Hillman et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- “I want to know what's in Pandora's box”: Comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencing
- (2012) Anne Townsend et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results
- (2012) Barbara A. Bernhardt et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- “What does it mean?”: Uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing
- (2012) Marian Reiff et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Chromosomal Microarray versus Karyotyping for Prenatal Diagnosis
- (2012) Ronald J. Wapner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- The Coming Explosion in Genetic Testing — Is There a Duty to Recontact?
- (2011) Reed E. Pyeritz NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started