How does altering the resolution of chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal setting affect the rates of pathological and uncertain findings?
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How does altering the resolution of chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal setting affect the rates of pathological and uncertain findings?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 649-657
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2013-07-19
DOI
10.3109/14767058.2013.825601
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- “If it helps …” the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: Patient and partners reflections
- (2013) Sarah C. Hillman et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) S. C. Hillman et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- An emerging phenotype of interstitial 15q25.2 microdeletions: Clinical report and review
- (2012) Orazio Palumbo et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results
- (2012) Barbara A. Bernhardt et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Chromosomal Microarray versus Karyotyping for Prenatal Diagnosis
- (2012) Ronald J. Wapner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies
- (2012) Lisa G. Shaffer et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Referral patterns for microarray testing in prenatal diagnosis
- (2012) Lisa G. Shaffer et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype
- (2011) G D'Amours et al. CLINICAL GENETICS
- American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants
- (2011) Hutton M Kearney et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Whole gene duplication of the PQBP1 gene in syndrome resembling Renpenning
- (2010) Maureen Flynn et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
- The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored
- (2010) D. Szklarczyk et al. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
- Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting
- (2010) Idit Maya et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2010) S. C. Hillman et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray
- (2009) Justine Coppinger et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype
- (2009) Linda Kleeman et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started