Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method
Published 2019 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method
Authors
Keywords
Citation analysis, Diagnostic radiology, Radiology and imaging, Scientific publishing, Database searching, Ultrasound imaging, Scientific misconduct, Research integrity
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages e0217918
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2019-06-14
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0217918
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The correlation between paper length and citations: a meta-analysis
- (2019) Juan Xie et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Honorary Authorship in Radiologic Research Articles
- (2018) Ronald L. Eisenberg et al. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
- Retraction of publications in nursing and midwifery research: A systematic review
- (2018) Amal Al-Ghareeb et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES
- An analysis of retractions of dental publications
- (2018) Clovis Mariano Faggion et al. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
- A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine
- (2017) Anthony Chauvin et al. European Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Review and Analysis of Publication Trends over Three Decades in Three High Impact Medicine Journals
- (2017) Alexander Ivanov et al. PLoS One
- Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review
- (2017) Justin Wang et al. World Neurosurgery
- Retracted Publications Within Radiology Journals
- (2016) Andrew B. Rosenkrantz AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
- Nutrition: ethical issues and challenges
- (2016) Robert B. Rucker et al. NUTRITION RESEARCH
- Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context
- (2016) Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva et al. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature
- (2016) Iman Tahamtan et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Scholarly publishing threatened?
- (2016) Arne Andersson et al. UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
- Retractions in orthopaedic research
- (2016) J. Yan et al. Bone & Joint Research
- Duplicate Publication in Radiology Journals
- (2015) Chris J. Hong et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
- Peer-Review Fraud — Hacking the Scientific Publication Process
- (2015) Charlotte J. Haug NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Fate of Articles That Warranted Retraction Due to Ethical Concerns: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study
- (2014) Nadia Elia et al. PLoS One
- Honorary Authorship in Radiologic Research Articles: Do Geographic Factors Influence the Frequency?
- (2013) Ronald L. Eisenberg et al. RADIOLOGY
- A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature
- (2012) Michael L. Grieneisen et al. PLoS One
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
- (2012) F. C. Fang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008
- (2011) E. Wager et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Honorary Authorship in Radiologic Research Articles: Assessment of Frequency and Associated Factors
- (2011) Ronald L. Eisenberg et al. RADIOLOGY
- Exact Probabilities and Confidence Limits for Binomial Samples: Applied to the Difference between Two Proportions
- (2011) Lorentz Jäntschi et al. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
- Empirical developments in retraction
- (2008) B K Redman et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Repairing research integrity
- (2008) Sandra L. Titus et al. NATURE
- The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns
- (2008) Yves Gingras et al. PLoS One
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started