4.7 Article

Green total factor productivity and its decomposition of Chinese manufacturing based on the MML index:2003-2015

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages 998-1008

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.080

Keywords

MML; Manufacturing; TFP; Productivity

Funding

  1. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0198]
  2. Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China [16ZDA047]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71673145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Manufacturing industry is an important part of economic development. Recognizing the sustainable development of regional manufacturing has an important guiding role in the formulation of environmental policies. Based on the meta-frontier Malmquist-Luenberger (MML) productivity index, this paper uses Chinese provincial panel data (2003-2015) to measure the green total factor productivity (TFP) of China's manufacturing. It is decomposed into the following: efficiency change (EC), change of the best practice gap ratio (BPC) and change of technical gap ratio (TGC). We compared the regional differences in green TFP growth in manufacturing in all provinces, analyzed regional and time differences in green TFP and the decomposition of manufacturing between regions and identified innovative regions. The results show that: (1) The average annual growth rate of green TFP in Chinese manufacturing is 0.85% with technological progress playing a key role. (2) There are differences in the causes of the increase in green TFP in all regions. The eastern region and the western region are driven by technological progress while the central region depends on technology catch-up effects. (3) Guangdong and Qinghai are two different types of global innovation regions with Guangdong driven by technological innovation and Qinghai driven by strict environmental protection systems. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available