4.8 Article

A novel biological sulfur reduction process for mercury-contaminated wastewater treatment

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 288-295

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.066

Keywords

Sulfidogenic bacteria; Sulfur-reducing bacteria; Mercury removal; Methylmercury; Geobacter

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51638005]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Planning Project [2017B050504003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sulfidogenic process driven by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) is not suitable for mercury-contaminated wastewater treatment due to the highly toxic methyl-mercury (MeHg) produced by SRB. In our previous study, we observed in short-term batch tests that sulfur-reducing bacteria ((SRB)-R-0) could remove mercury ions without MeHg production. Thus, the aim of this study is to develop a biological sulfur reduction process driven by (SRB)-R-0 for mercury-contaminated wastewater, and investigate its long-term performance on mercury removal and MeHg accumulation. Receiving mercury-contaminated wastewater containing 0-50 mg Hg(II)/L for 326 days, (SRB)-R-0 in the sulfur-reducing bioreactor showed high tolerance with mercury toxicity, and removed 99.4% +/- 1.4% of the influent Hg(II) by biogenic sulfide. MeHg was always found to be undetectable in the bioreactor, even though the sulfidogenic bacteria were exposed to high levels of Hg(II) in long-term trials. The result of qPCR analysis further revealed that the mercury-methylation functional gene (hgcA) concentration in the bioreactor sludge was found to be extremely lower than in the SRB-enriched sludge, Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA and Desulfomicrobium baculatum DSM 4028, implying that there was no or few mercury methylators in the bioreactor. In short, the biological sulfur reduction process using (SRB)-R-0 can efficiently treat mercury-contaminated wastewater, with high Hg(II) removal efficiency and no MeHg accumulation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available