4.4 Article

Effect of air classification processing variables on yield, composition, and certain antinutrients of air-classified fractions from field peas by response surface methodology

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.13999

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of processing parameters of air classification on the yield, composition, and certain antinutritive values of the air-classified fractions from peas was investigated using response surface methodology. Results indicated that increasing classifier wheel speed increased yield and starch content of starch-rich fraction, protein, and total dietary fiber (TDF) content of protein-rich fraction, but reduced yield and starch content of protein-rich fraction, protein, and TDF content of starch-rich fraction. Increasing air flow rate reduced yield of starch-rich fraction, protein, and TDF content in protein-rich fraction, but increased yield and starch content in protein-rich fraction, and TDF content in starch-rich fraction. The optimum conditions, based on maximizing the yield, and maximizing/minimizing the protein or starch content while lowering certain antinutritional values in the protein-rich and starch-rich fractions, were established. Good agreement was found between experimental values of the fractions obtained at optimum conditions and predicted values obtained using the models developed. Practical applicationsProcessing variables of air classification significantly affected the composition and antinutritional values of the fractions derived from field peas. The models established in this study not only provide an understanding of the interactive effect of processing variables on characteristics of air-classified protein-rich and starch-rich fractions but also can be used to select optimal processing conditions. Furthermore, pulse flours/ingredients with different composition could be produced using various combinations of classifier wheel speed and air flow rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available