4.7 Review

Targeting ideal oral vaccine vectors based on probiotics: a systematical view

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages 3941-3953

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-019-09770-7

Keywords

Probiotics; Oral vaccine vector; Stability; Colonization; Immunoreactivity

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0500105, 2016YFD0500905]
  2. Department of Science and Technology in Guangxi Autonomous Region [AA18118050]
  3. Chinese National Science Foundation [31672579, 31873010, 31800121, 30571374, 30771603, 31072136, 31270171]
  4. international collaboration program of the Science and Technology Department of Yangzhou [YZ2018154]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probiotics have great potential to be engineered into oral vaccine delivery systems, which can facilitate elicitation of mucosal immunity without latent risks of pathogenicity. Combined with the progressive understanding of probiotics and the mucosal immune system as well as the advanced biotechniques of genetic engineering, the development of promising oral vaccine vectors based on probiotics is available while complicated and demanding. Therefore, a systematical view on the design of practical probiotic vectors is necessary, which will help to logically analyze and resolve the problems that might be neglected during our exploration. Here, we attempt to systematically summarize several fundamental issues vital to the effectiveness of the vector of probiotics, including the stability of the engineered vectors, the optimization of antigen expression, the improvement of colonization, and the enhancement of immunoreactivity. We also compared the existent strategies and some developing ones, attempting to figure out an optimal strategy that might deserve to be referred in the future development of oral vaccine vectors based on probiotics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available